
So far, we have taken a reductionist approaches to study ecological process:
Study a complex system by breaking it down into component interactions
We contrasted this with a “holistic” approach
Study complex systems as whole systems
Emphasis on “Emergent properties” that are only evident when we study the full system
Using a reductionist approach, we have focused on mechanisms that explain why nature is the way it is
We will now study similar patterns but at a higher scale
Goal is to identify what patterns do exist,
and why they come to be.
e.g. Is there more biodiversity in some parts of the Earth than others? Why?
e.g. Within Louisiana, are there times of the year where natural communities have more biodiversity than others? Why?
Small-ish spatial scales, e.g. patterns of diversity across a single mountain
Medium spatial scales, e.g. differences in biodiversity across islands in an archipelago
Large spatial scales, e.g. continental patterns
We will also explore variation in biodiversity across temporal scales (i.e. change over time)
In Week 1, we asked a simple question: How many bats live under a bridge in Austin?
We will now ask a second simple question: What is the biodiversity of an ecological community?












Consider two locations where the same set of twelves species can be found.
In the first location, the bird community is dominated by just a few species:

In second location, individuals from each species are fairly common:

Small group discussion:
What is the biodiversity in each location?
If you go to Location 1 vs. Location 2 and spend 10 minutes in each, do you think you would see an equal number of species?
Community 1




Community 2




… isn’t so simple either.
How to account for variation in abundance?
How to acccount for variation in functional differences?
How to account for phylogenetic history differences?
We need to use some clever math to help us quantify these patterns!



A quantitative measure of biodiversity and community “evenness”
\[\overbrace{H'}^{\substack{\text{Shannon}\\{\text{index}}}} = -\sum_{i = 1}^{n} \overbrace{p_i}^{\substack{\text{proportional}\\ \text{abundance}}}*\overbrace{\text{ ln}(p_i)}^{\log\big(\substack{\text{proportional}\\ \text{abundance}}\big)}\]

| species | Abundance | proportion | log(proportion) | contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cardinal | 32 | |||
| Blue jay | 29 | |||
| Mockingbird | 20 | |||
| House sparrow | 7 | |||
| Carolina wren | 3 | |||
| Carolina chickadee | 2 | |||
| Red-bellied woodpecker | 2 | |||
| Downy woodpecker | 1 | |||
| Magnolia warbler | 1 | |||
| Yellow-rumped warbler | 1 | |||
| Prothonotory warbler | 1 | |||
| Red-tailed hawk | 1 |
| species | Abundance | proportion | log(proportion) | contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cardinal | 32 | 0.32 | ||
| Blue jay | 29 | 0.29 | ||
| Mockingbird | 20 | 0.20 | ||
| House sparrow | 7 | 0.07 | ||
| Carolina wren | 3 | 0.03 | ||
| Carolina chickadee | 2 | 0.02 | ||
| Red-bellied woodpecker | 2 | 0.02 | ||
| Downy woodpecker | 1 | 0.01 | ||
| Magnolia warbler | 1 | 0.01 | ||
| Yellow-rumped warbler | 1 | 0.01 | ||
| Prothonotory warbler | 1 | 0.01 | ||
| Red-tailed hawk | 1 | 0.01 |
| species | Abundance | proportion | log(proportion) | contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cardinal | 32 | 0.32 | -1.139 | |
| Blue jay | 29 | 0.29 | -1.238 | |
| Mockingbird | 20 | 0.20 | -1.609 | |
| House sparrow | 7 | 0.07 | -2.659 | |
| Carolina wren | 3 | 0.03 | -3.507 | |
| Carolina chickadee | 2 | 0.02 | -3.912 | |
| Red-bellied woodpecker | 2 | 0.02 | -3.912 | |
| Downy woodpecker | 1 | 0.01 | -4.605 | |
| Magnolia warbler | 1 | 0.01 | -4.605 | |
| Yellow-rumped warbler | 1 | 0.01 | -4.605 | |
| Prothonotory warbler | 1 | 0.01 | -4.605 | |
| Red-tailed hawk | 1 | 0.01 | -4.605 |
| species | Abundance | proportion | log(proportion) | contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cardinal | 32 | 0.32 | -1.139 | -0.364 |
| Blue jay | 29 | 0.29 | -1.238 | -0.359 |
| Mockingbird | 20 | 0.20 | -1.609 | -0.322 |
| House sparrow | 7 | 0.07 | -2.659 | -0.186 |
| Carolina wren | 3 | 0.03 | -3.507 | -0.105 |
| Carolina chickadee | 2 | 0.02 | -3.912 | -0.078 |
| Red-bellied woodpecker | 2 | 0.02 | -3.912 | -0.078 |
| Downy woodpecker | 1 | 0.01 | -4.605 | -0.046 |
| Magnolia warbler | 1 | 0.01 | -4.605 | -0.046 |
| Yellow-rumped warbler | 1 | 0.01 | -4.605 | -0.046 |
| Prothonotory warbler | 1 | 0.01 | -4.605 | -0.046 |
| Red-tailed hawk | 1 | 0.01 | -4.605 | -0.046 |


Across time (e.g. More diversity in some seasons than other; More diversity in some years than others; More biodiversity in some time periods than others)
Across space (e.g. More diversity in one part of Baton Rouge than another; More diversity in some parts of Louisiana than other; More biodiversity in some parts of the globe than other)
But it is not just the number of species that are variable; we can also need to think about heterogeneity across time and space
Consider a landscape that comprises several different habitat patches.
Each habitat patch has a given number of species
How much total diversity is there in the whole landscape?
Consider a different landscape that comprises several different habitat patches.
Each habitat patch has a given number of species
How much total diversity is there in the whole landscape?
Requires knowledge of who lives where, and when
Requires metrics that capture not just numbers of species, but changes in species identity
pop quiz: how many species of native plants are in Louisiana?
“Did you know that Louisiana has about 2,500 native plants?”
But, not all plants are everywhere!
. . . Bottomland Hardwood Forests and Swamps
Prominent Physical Features: Forested wetlands that occupy broad floodplains and depressions bordering large river systems. The soil, hydrology and plant community vary based on river influence and landscape position. Floodplain soils are fertile and desired for agriculture, so most of the original forests have been converted to agriculture. Flood control efforts have also degraded the forests of this plant region.
Prominent Vegetation: Oaks, cottonwood, sycamores, elms, maples and ashes in bottomland hardwood forests. Bald cypress, water tupelo and swamp tupelo occur in the swamps
Coastal Prairies
Prominent Physical Features: Coastal Prairies Prominent Physical Features: Extension of Midwestern tall-grass prairie, with a subtropical influence. Once covered approximately 2.5 million acres in Louisiana. Modern agriculture has reduced Louisiana’s coastal prairie to less than 1 percent of its former extent. Today, coastal prairie is limited to small remnants on grazing land, along railroads and a few small patches in urban areas. Fire, along with harsh soil conditions, restrict woody species to forests along streams dissecting the plant region
Prominent Vegetation: A diverse mix of lush grasses (little bluestem, big bluestem, eastern gamma grass, switchgrass, and Indian grass), sedges, rushes, and many wildflowers.
There is clearly lots of turnover between regions
Bottomland Hardwood Forests and Swamps
Prominent Vegetation: Oaks, cottonwood, sycamores, elms, maples and ashes in bottomland hardwood forests. Bald cypress, water tupelo and swamp tupelo occur in the swamps
Coastal Prairies
Prominent Vegetation: A diverse mix of lush grasses (little bluestem, big bluestem, eastern gamma grass, switchgrass, and Indian grass), sedges, rushes, and many wildflowers.
Such turnover can also happen on local scales
e.g. Within a forest, the plant community next to a streambed (wet soils) will be different from the plant community at the top of a ridge (dry soils)
The concepts of \(\alpha\), \(\beta\), and \(\gamma\) diversity help us make sense of these patterns.
In the following communities, each species is represented by a different letter.
Let’s calculate \(\alpha\), \(\beta\), and \(\gamma\) diversity.
\(\alpha_{\text{community }1} = 7 \text{ species}\)
\(\alpha_{\text{community }2} = 6 \text{ species}\)
\(\gamma = 8 \text{ species}\) (A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H)
\(\beta\) is the number of species unique to one community
Your turn: calculate \(\alpha\), \(\beta\), and \(\gamma\) diversity for the following
Here, we are introducing \(\beta\) diversity over space – but we can also think about \(\beta\) diversity over time
How many (and which) species are found in University Lakes in January? How about in March?




Quantifying patterns of biodiversity is essential for getting a good grasp on managing and protecting biodiversity

More on this in the next two weeks.